Another observation I can see is that the teams with the higher population actually tend to be some of the more successful teams. Now does this exactly make sense, no it truly does not, but it's very intriguing? Of course, there are a few exceptions to that statement such as the San Diego Padres, Boston Red Sox, and the St. Lewis Cardinals. These teams have a larger population than most but tend to do very well regularly in playoffs. On this note, we can look at teams that do not fit the high population and success statement. We can see teams such as the Angels and Cubs who have historically been terrible. The Cubs won their first world series in 108 years in 2016. The Angels have two generational young talents on their team currently and have still struggled to make their way through playoffs or even come close to anything at all.
Now disregarding the few teams that don't match the success and population hypothesis the rest of the MLB teams actually make sense. We can see teams like the Los Angelos Dodgers and the New York Yankees having substantially high populations compared to the rest of the teams. The New York Yankees have the most world series wins by a landslide at 27 while the Dodgers have been on an absolute tear the last few years winning the world series in 2020 and making it into the world series 7 game series countless amount of times. Therefore I can conclude that for the most part, the populations of teams have an indication of the team's success disregarding my 4 examples of teams that are a little lopsided statically. As I stated before, absolutely anything can happen in an MLB season and the team you expect to win on any given day will honestly most likely be the opposite team.

Comments
Post a Comment